�鶹Ƶ��

Cone snails are venomous marine gastropods that hydraulically propel a hollow, chitinous radular harpoon into prey. This radular harpoon serves both as projectile and conduit for venom delivery. In the fish-hunting cone snail Conus catus, the radular harpoon is also utilized to tether the snail to its prey, rapidly paralyzed by neuroexcitatory peptides. Effective prey capture in C. catus requires both fast-acting neurotoxins and a delivery system quick enough to exceed the prey fish’s rapid escape responses. In a newly published paper, "," Biology Prof. Joseph Schulz and his co-authors, including �鶹Ƶ��undergrad collaborators, Ian Jan '20 and Gerleen Sangha '17, report here that the cone snail’s prey strike is one of the fastest in the animal kingdom. A unique cellular latch mechanism prevents harpoon release until sufficient pressure builds and overcomes the forces of the latch, resulting in rapid acceleration into prey. The radular harpoon then rapidly decelerates as its bulbous base reaches the end of the proboscis, a distensible hydrostatic skeleton extended toward the prey, with little slowing during prey impalement. The velocities achieved are the fastest movements of any mollusk and exceed previous estimates by over an order of magnitude.

In an anonymous IRB-approved study of ~1100 participants across 14 STEM fields from 46 countries, Biology Prof. Amber Stubler's new paper, "," investigated the pervasiveness and long-term implications of receiving unprofessional comments as an author during peer review. Over half of the respondents indicated that they had received an unprofessional review at some point during their career. When evaluating the impacts of these reviews on the authors' perceived scientific aptitude, productivity, and career advancement, clear differences between groups were found. White men were the least likely to doubt their scientific aptitude or experience lower productivity after receiving an unprofessional review relative to underrepresented groups in STEM (men of color, white women and white non-binary people and women of color and non-binary people of color). Women of color and non-binary people of color were the most likely to perceive delays in career advancement, and their experience differed significantly from white women and non-binary people of color, highlighting how important it is to evaluate intersectionality (Crenshaw 1991) in these types of studies. This new study demonstrates that the content of peer reviews passed along to authors may be an additional barrier to equity in STEM fields. (Note: the article quickly created a stir on Twitter and was picked up by the news. See, for example, .)

The ubiquitous use of high stakes tests in K-12 schools in the United States has a deleterious effect on students of color (e.g., Black and Latino). Punitive policies related to test outcomes, such as retention and graduation, have been particularly damaging. In fact, the historical use of tests has been linked to exclusionary and racist motives resulting in discriminatory practices in college admissions while leading to genetic and cultural deficit theories to explain low achievement for students of color. Education Prof. Ronald W. Solorzano's new article, "," explains how the legacy of these early uses of tests has maintained its adverse presence in today’s educational landscape. National data on grade retention, high school dropout rates, and achievement indicate that students of color are disproportionately penalized by school-based policies resulting in an unequal educational experience. Unfortunately, these trends have been persistent reflecting achievement gaps between White and Asian students and Latino and Black students, and where, in most cases, no meaningful progress in eliminating these gaps has been made. English learners are particularly harmed by these policies and tests since language and opportunity to learn (OTL) concerns persist. Trends of low achievement are attributed to poorly resourced schools, cultural deficit theories employed by school personnel, and the invalid use of tests. Schools could serve students better by employing a curriculum and instruction that is culturally and linguistically relevant, that integrates communities and schools to critically analyze their educational and social-political status and agency thus empowering both for lasting change. Furthermore, teachers need to be empowered to be instructional leaders who critically evaluate their curriculum and instruction so as to educate and liberate students of color.

MAC Prof. Allison de Fren's scholarly video essay (2018) examines a sub-genre of the Frankenstein film in which a mad doctor attempts to revive a disfigured/dead daughter/fiancée by stealing parts from female victims. As the video demonstrates, the (often unmet) critical potential of such films is their narrative condensation of the part-for-whole logic through which female bodies are often represented in the media. [Followup: de Fren’s video essay was included in !]

Some contend that politics functions best when deference is given to tradition and authoritative community norms, while others argue for the importance of independent thought and doubt about received sources of authority. Insight into this question can be found in the work of Alexis de Tocqueville. While Tocqueville is often taken to regard the doubt characteristic of intellectual independence solely as a pathology, Politics Prof. Alec Arellano's new article, "," shows that he also saw it as a potential precursor to conversation, a stimulus to self-assured conviction, and a counter to distortionary abstractions. Nonetheless, Tocqueville also elaborates the destructive outcomes of too much doubt and intellectual independence. Arellano identifies the ways in which Tocqueville seeks to discipline and educate the drive to independent thought so as to attain its benefits without falling victim to its pathologies. (Note: This article builds on the scholarship of the late Politics Prof. Roger Boesche.)

DWA Prof. Phillip Ayoub published published an article and an essay in the second half of 2019:

• The emergence of gay rights as a salient political issue in global politics leads DWA Prof. Phillip Ayoub and co-author Douglas Page to ask, “Who is empowered to be politically active in various societies?” What current research misses is a comparison of levels of participation (voting and protesting) between states that make stronger and weaker appeals to homophobia. In their article, ""--an analysis of survey data from Europe and Latin America--they argue that the alignment between the norms of sexuality a state promotes and an individual’s personal attitudes on sexuality increases felt political efficacy. They find that individuals who are tolerant of homosexuality are more likely to participate in states with gay-friendly policies in comparison with intolerant individuals. The reverse also holds: individuals with low education levels that are intolerant of homosexuality are more likely to participate in states espousing political homophobia.
  
• Ayoub's "" dialogues with Htun and Weldon's exceptional new book, The Logics of Gender Justice, as it relates to LGBTI rights. Beyond engaging the authors' questions of when and why governments promote women's rights, Ayoub also engage their argument that equality is not one issue but many linked issues, including issues of sexuality and gender identity. His own reflections on their work thus address the contributions the book makes to the study of political science, as well as open questions about how their logic of gender justice might apply across other issue areas less explored in the book. Htun and Weldon's own definition of gender justice also rightly includes space for LGBTQI people, which he sees as an invitation to think through the typology in relation to these communities.

Geologic records of past earthquakes are rare but critical for identifying long-term patterns in fault behavior and assessing modern earthquake hazards. In a new paper, "," Geology Prof. Darren Larsen and co-authors (including �鶹Ƶ��undergrad, Aria Blum '19) present a continuous 14,000-year paleoearthquake reconstruction using precisely dated lacustrine sediments and landslide deposits from a lake basin positioned directly on the Teton normal fault, which cuts across Grand Teton National Park, WY, and is among the most hazardous intraplate faults in the western US. They show that beginning immediately after deglaciation, a series of at least seven major fault ruptures occurred at regular intervals of ~1,050 years (± ~250 years), followed by >5,000 years of inactivity. These results are consistent with trench data and model simulations and suggest faulting was variably influenced by climate-controlled glacial fluctuations and magmatic activity of the nearby Yellowstone hotspot.

In a new article, "," Politics Prof. Jennifer M. Piscopo and coauthor Mariana Caminotti compare the career paths and policy priorities of women and men elected to the Argentine Congress. Conventional wisdom suggests that women legislators who represent feminist policy areas will find their career options curtailed by party leaders. However, they find that feminist lawmakers are not punished by party leaders for their feminist views -- but neither are they rewarded. Feminist women legislators face the same inequalities in their careers as non-feminist women, indicating that gendered barriers persist, but that these barriers are not tied to particular policy priorities.

It is known via work of Duke and Ghate that there are only finitely many pairs of full level, degree one eigenforms f and g whose product fg is also an eigenform. In a newly published paper, "," Math Prof. Jim Brown and co-authors prove a partial generalization of this theorem for degree two Siegel modular forms. Namely, they show that there is only one pair of eigenforms F and G such that FG is a non-cuspidal eigenform. In the case that FG is a cuspform, they provide necessary conditions for FG to be an eigenform, give one example, and conjecture that is the only example.

This year Psychology Prof. Andrea Hopmeyer published three articles.

• Although peer crowd affiliations have been studied among emerging adults in college, this work has yet to focus in on LGBT-identifying students. Accordingly, Prof. Hopmeyer's current study, "," a) surveyed the peer crowd landscape using a sample of 234 LGBT students (Mage = 19.89, SD = 1.55; 70.51% female, 18.38% male, 11.11% other) at a small, private, liberal arts college in Southern California, and b) explored the relationships between self-reported peer crowd affiliations and LGBT students’ adjustment (i.e., loneliness, belongingness, and academic-, alcohol-, drug-, and sex-risk behaviors). Results point to the existence of four underlying peer crowd dimensions among LGBT students: protester, nonvocal, social, and athletic. Furthermore, affiliation with these peer crowds was found to relate to students’ self-reported loneliness and academic-, drug-, and sex-risk behaviors.
  
• Social media platforms and instant messaging applications have a widespread presence in today’s secondary schools. However, the implications of these ubiquitous communication technologies for adolescent’s social functioning with peers and academic competence in the classroom are not well understood. In fact, research on adolescents’ digital lives has only rarely incorporated direct assessments of adjustment in school environments. Prof. Hopmeyer's study, "," addressed these limitations with a school-based data collection. 376 adolescents (Mage = 14.4; 209 girls; including 29.2% Latino/Hispanic, 27.3% White, 28.2% mixed) were recruited from an urban high school and followed for one year. Social reputations were indexed via peer nominations and electronic communication tendencies were assessed using self-report questionnaires. Grade point averages, disciplinary events, and attendance data were obtained from school records. On a cross-sectional basis, frequent use of fashionable social networks (i.e., Instagram, Snapchat, and Twitter) was associated with popular-aggressive social reputations, poor achievement, and rule-breaking behavior. E-mail use, in contrast, was associated with academic competence. Longitudinal analyses were less conclusive because the examined constructs were highly stable across the period of data collection. The full pattern of findings indicates that electronic communication patterns can be a powerful marker of academic and social functioning at school.
  
• Although previous research has clearly demonstrated the impact that peer crowd affiliation has on socio-emotional and risk-related outcomes, very few studies have investigated this relation in samples of emerging adults, and even fewer have focused specifically on commuter college students. Accordingly, Prof. Hopmeyer's study, "," aimed to fill this gap in the literature by exploring the relationship between peer crowds and college adjustment at a commuter school. Participants were 663 students at a large public university in Southern California (campus population of 92% commuters). Factor analytic results indicated the presence of four crowd dimensions on campus: (a) social/partiers, (b) creatives and activists, (c) campus active, and (d) international students. Furthermore, path analysis results indicated that these crowd dimensions predict loneliness, college belongingness, and risk behaviors. Overall, the results of this study indicate the presence of a peer crowd landscape unique to commuter schools that has important implications for student adjustment.

In a newly published paper, "," Economics Prof. Kevin Williams and his co-author study the optimal organization of a school day with respect to the timing and structure of student's daily schedules. They analyze five cohorts of students at a higher education institution which includes data on over 180,000 student-course outcomes. They show that expected performance of two students taking the same class at the same time of day may differ by as much as 0.15 standard deviations, simply due to their prior schedules that day. They show that prioritizing certain student schedules could be equivalent to improving their teacher quality by 0.33 of a standard deviation.

Psychology and Cognitive Science Prof. Andrew Shtulman recently published three essays.

• Research from developmental psychology, cognitive psychology, and cognitive neuroscience reveals that people readily endorse multiple explanations of the same phenomena, even when those explanations are logically incompatible. In a new chapter, "" Prof. Shtulman and his co-author discusses cases of non-scientific explanations coexisting with scientific ones. They ;explore a range of nonscientific explanations, including religious explanations (e.g., attributing illness to God), superstitious explanations (e.g., attributing illness to witchcraft), and pseudoscientific explanations (e.g., attributing illness to behaviors unrelated to germs). We argue that the ubiquity of coexisting explanations across cultures and domains implies that coexistence is an inherent feature of conceptual representations and a regular impediment to understanding science. We conclude by considering several questions about the origin and dynamics of coexistence that may shed further light on our understanding and acceptance of scientific explanations.
  
• Why are some scientific ideas particularly difficult to grasp? Atoms, germs, heat, inertia, heliocentrism, natural selection, continental drift : these ideas were slow to develop in the history of science and remain slow to develop in the minds of individuals, but the reasons for the historical delay are not necessarily the same as the reasons for the cognitive delay. Scientists and students have different explanatory goals, different empirical concerns, and different background assumptions. In a newly published chapter, "," Prof. Shtulman aims to show how these factors can render the same idea counterintuitive for different reasons. This comparison of scientists’ and students’ conceptual ecologies has implications not only for theories of scientific knowledge but also for the practice of teaching science to nonscientists.
  
• Belief in supernatural beings is widespread across cultures, but the properties of those beings vary from one culture to another. The supernatural beings that are part of Hinduism, for instance, are represented as human-like, whereas those that are part of Islam are represented more abstractly. In a newly published paper, "," Prof. Shtulman and co-authors explore how children exposed to both types of representations conceptualize the relevant beings. They administered several measures of anthropomorphism to Hindu and Muslim children (n = 124) from a religiously-diverse community in India. Participants consistently anthropomorphized fictional beings (ghosts and fairies) and Hindu beings (Ganesha and Krishna) but varied in their anthropomorphization of Islamic beings (Muhammad, Allah). Younger participants (aged 8 to 11) anthropomorphized Islamic beings more than older participants (aged 12 to 15), and Hindu participants anthropomorphized them more than Muslim participants. These findings suggest that children initially anthropomorphize supernatural beings but can learn to conceptualize them more abstractly if encouraged by cultural input. They also suggest that abstract conceptions of divine agents are not a universal endpoint in the development of religious cognition.

History Prof. Lisa Sousa’s chapter titled “Flowers and Speech in Discourses on Deviance in Book 10” was published in The Florentine Codex: An Encyclopedia of the Nahua World in Sixteenth-Century Mexico. The Florentine Codex is a 12-volume work on Nahua (Aztec) society, religion, political history, and the natural history of central Mexico written and illustrated in the mid-sixteenth century by Nahua noblemen under the direction of a Spanish friar, Bernardino de Sahagún. The article argues that the Nahuatl text, Spanish translation, and indigenous pictorials in the book on society reveal three distinct discourses on deviance. In both the Nahuatl-language texts and images of social deviants, speech and flowers are metaphors for illicit sexuality and immorality, more generally, but these pervasive, powerful Nahua symbols are glossed over in the Spanish translation. When the Nahuatl texts, Spanish translations, and images are read against one another, they reveal how multiple understandings of immorality operated in the early colonial period, and how writers and artists employed a variety of strategies to convey moral danger.

DWA Prof. Anthony Tirado Chase's opening chapter to (Peterson and Kayaoglu, eds.) presents a theoretical and conceptual framework for analyzing and understanding the Organization of Islamic Cooperation and human rights. Will the OIC’s engagement with human rights advance human rights in the Muslim world or are these efforts a problematic strategy to co-opt or even subvert human rights? And, more broadly, what does the OIC’s engagement with human rights say about the ways in which human rights norms are independently affected by international organizations, either positively or negatively? The argument that follows is that an international organization such as the OIC, dominated by conservative, authoritarian states, is unlikely to create political opportunity structures to advance human rights. Indeed, the OIC’s record shows that, if it has had any independent impact on human rights at all, the effect has been to galvanize regional and international opposition to human rights expansion, particularly in domains of sexuality and economic rights.

BiologyProf. Gretchen North and several Occidental students, past and present, are coauthors on two articles published recently, both based at least in part on research conducted at La Selva Biological Station in the rain forest of Costa Rica. The first study, "," involved leaf-level measurements of photosynthesis and solar-induced chlorophyll fluorescence from tropical trees as well as other plant species, and the second study, "H," used anatomical, physiological, and genetic methods to analyze pathways of water movement through leaves of a tank bromeliad during drought and recovery.

Political parties act as gatekeepers, meaning that electing more women depends on parties’ willingness to nominate women candidates. In a new study by Prof. Jennifer Piscopo (Politics), "," she and her co-authors highlight how, when parties make nomination decisions in times of public discontent, women's nominations increase. They theorize that parties hold similar biases to voters: gender stereotypes that regard women as more trustworthy and honest should advantage women as political trust falls and perceptions of corruption rise. Using two waves of data from over 100 political parties in 18 Latin American countries, they find that parties nominate more women when a large proportion of the public distrusts the national legislature.

History Prof. Sasha Day's "" chapter of traces the development of the historical and political category "peasant" in China. Emerging out of a complex set of often contradictory images of the peasant, a peasant dialectic developed during the Chinese revolution, which explained the conditions under which peasants were either conservative or progressive. Following the establishment of the People's Republic of China in 1949, this dialectic began to breakdown. By the 1980s, a liberal reversal of the peasant dialectic became dominant, setting the stage for discrimination against rural migrants during the Reform Period.

In their recently published chapter "," Philosophy Prof. Clair Morrissey and Elena Neale (Philosophy and Psychology, ‘20) suggest a fuller understanding of the obligation to respect patient autonomy can be gained by recognizing patients as historically and socially situated agents, whose values are developed, challenged, and changed, rather than merely applied, in their decision-making about their use of preimplantation genetic diagnosis or preimplantation genetic screening (PGD/PGS). They ground this discussion in empirical research on the patients’ experiences with these genetic technologies, and suggest that promoting patients’ self-respect is a important ethical standard for PGD/PGS providers and practices to recognize.

Prof. Julie Prebel (Writing & Rhetoric)published a chapter titled "" in an edited collection on Wright. Prebel's chapter focuses on Wright's autobiography, which chronicles his experiences as a child in the south and his migration north where he begins his writing career, as she shows how Wright's narrative highlights the effects of white supremacy experienced by blacks -- particularly on the development of consciousness and identity. Prebel argues that writing becomes the means through which Wright enacts self-representation, resists racial oppression, and emphasizes the necessity of social justice for blacks.

American Studies Prof. Courtney R. Baker's essay, "," was published in the spring edition of the online journal Dilettante Army. The essay considers monuments such as those commemorating the Confederacy as speech acts in the public sphere and how current artists are using scale to provide redress.

It is difficult to interpret air quality measures, such as the source of a measured exposure, in areas burdened by multiple sources of pollution or cumulative impacts. In their pilot study, "," Prof. Bhavna Shamasunder (UEP) and co-authors were able to identify several volatile organic compounds that have been linked with oil development operations. This research is a start to help better determine the air pollution burden that oil development operations pose in densely populated, environmental justice neighborhoods such as South Los Angeles.

In the United States, 1 out of 4 babies is born at a designated "Baby-Friendly" hospital. However, recent popular press has critiqued "Baby-Friendly" birth practices as failing mothers. In her recent article, "," Prof. Erica Preston-Roedder (Philosophy) collaborates with historians and philosophers to contextualize these critiques. While Baby-Friendly practices do fail mothers in certain respects, these same policies are rooted in a tradition of supporting and empowering women. Their article demonstrates how liberatory intentions, when institutionalized by hospitals and other forces, can have unforeseen consequences.

Prof. Kristi Upson-Saia (Religious Studies) published a new article, "" in which she analyzes Gregory's treatise on virginity--and the broader custom of calling ascetic woman a "garden enclosed"--alongside the study of Romans' material garden spaces. Upson-Saia suggests that Gregory capitalized on common views about the supernatural flourishing and everlasting bounty of gardens in order to amplify his argument that virginity, and the Christian garden paradise, served as a limit or boundary to corruption and death. She further argues that Gregory stationed the Christian virgin at the enclosure of the παράδεισος as a replacement of the conventional garden guardian, Priapus, who was known for his permanently erect phallus and his violent sexual threats against those who trespassed into the garden. This juxtaposition pit the asexuality of Christian virginity against the hypersexuality of the “pagan” demi-god and highlighted virginity's role in admitting outsiders into the utopic space over against Priapus's role of restricting access.

Profs. John Liu (Sociology) and Yating Chuang (Economics) collected a comprehensive list of twenty-seven introductory economics textbooks in the United States and analyzed their coverage of climate change. Their finding, published in an article titled "," show that all texts conceptualize climate change as a problem of carbon emission’s negative externalities and the preferred market-based solutions. Somewhat alarmingly, a small subset of texts deviates from the scientific consensus on the human causes of climate change. Liu and Chuang also provide suggestions for economics educators to innovate the current introductory curriculum to better cope with the climate crisis.

Prof. Kelema Lee Moses (Art & Art History) published an in The Contemporary Pacific for the show, Holo Moana: Generations of Oceanic Voyaging. The show, housed in the Joseph M. Long Gallery at the Bernice Pauahi Bishop Museum, covered a lot of territory: embracing and disseminating indigenous knowledge, exploring the ways in which cultural exchange allows communities to gain a deeper understanding about themselves and the world, and examining the impact of technology on tradition and culture. Moses argues that that the show succeeded in critically “re-awakening, re-activating, and re-envisioning” wayfinding as a means of bringing attention to what Oceanic knowledge teaches us about the Earth and its people.

In a new article, "," in Birding Magazine, Prof. John McCormack (Biology) explains in plain language how the bird specimens in the Moore Lab are helping to answer pressing environmental questions involving habitat alteration and climate change.

Prof. Jake Mackey’s (CSLC) new article, “,” attempts to revise a common view among ancient historians to the effect that Romans ignored children’s cognitive ontogeny, perceiving early childhood as a largely undifferentiated life stage. Prof. Mackey presents evidence from over four hundred years of Roman writing to make three points against Roman neglect of children. First, a consensus about “developmental psychology” prevailed from the late republic to late antiquity. Second, this consensus is consistent with modern findings and theories. The Roman material maps onto a developmental timeline featuring a “2-month revolution,” when the infant engages in dyadic protoconversations with adults, and a “9-month revolution,” when the infant shares attention triadically with adults toward third objects. In the Roman consensus, both dyadic protoconversations and triadic joint attention were central to cultural learning. Third, when the Roman consensus about children’s minds did change, it was because of the Christian doctrine of original sin, according to which even newborns were psychologically corrupt.

In urban low-income Los Angeles neighborhoods, children have very few opportunities to engage in physical activity outside of the school campus. Additionally, a majority of play surfaces at Los Angeles Unified School District (LAUSD) schools are asphalt with minimal tree canopy coverage. Kinesiology Prof. Marci Raney published a new article, "," that presents the results from a 3-year study conducted at Title 1 LAUSD elementary schools after a large-scale schoolyard greening project at one location. Results from the first longitudinal multi-method controlled research study of schoolyard greening suggest that replacing large areas of asphalt with green space may be an effective way to improve physical activity levels and social interactions, particularly for girls and older students who are typically the least likely to meet federal physical activity guidelines. Read more in the press release linked here.

Mathematics Prof. Ron Buckmire's new article, "," appeared in the Notices of the American Mathematical Society. (The Notices is the signature publication of the American Mathematical Society, and goes out to roughly 30,000 subscribers monthly.)

The article is a summary of relatively recent developments in undergraduate mathematics education--describing various pedagogical innovations, demographic changes, expanding career options and new curricular pathways--that mathematics researchers may not be aware of. Prof. Buckmire disseminates information about exciting and innovative projects that he became aware of as part of his work at the National Science Foundation's Division of Undergraduate Education from 2016 to 2018, curating responses to the question "What are the most significant results, events, or developments in undergraduate mathematics education of the last decade?" provided by recognized experts in the field.

A was devoted to DWA Prof. Philip Ayoub’s book, . The five articles, with a response from Prof. Ayoub, address a few core themes, including the artificial gulf between research on LGBT politics in the US and outside it; the complexities of the “coming out” repertoire; the pressures of EU accession; and the theory’s applicability to non-LGBT groups (including regressive groups), to other issues (e.g., sex worker rights and abortion), and to contemporary events (e.g., Brexit and anti-immigration populism in Europe). These themes also touch on issues of nationalism, religious-nationalism, and homonationalism as they relate to political science.

History Prof. Jane Hong's new book, (University of North Carolina Press, 2019), is the first historical study of the transpacific movement to repeal U.S. laws excluding Asians from immigration and naturalization. It argues that the U.S. rise to global supremacy generally—and its unprecedented expansion in Asia specifically—compelled a reopening of U.S. borders to Asians during World War II and the early Cold War as part of the price of its postwar empire. The book draws upon archives in three countries--the United States, India, and the Philippines--bridging the study of U.S. empire and U.S. immigration policy with transnational Asian American history.

The term "fanatic," from the European Reformation to today, has never been a stable one. Then and now it has been reductively defined to justify state violence against poor and racialized communities and to delegitimize alternative sources of authority. English Prof. Ross Lerner's new book, ,(Fordham University Press, 2019), rejects the simplified binary of fanatical religion and rational politics, turning to Reformation literature, religion, and philosophy to demonstrate that religious fanaticism was integral to how modern politics and poetics developed, from the German Peasants’ Revolt to the English Civil War.

Prof. Kenji Liu (Art & Art History) published a full-length poetry collection, (Alice James Books). It is a timely, critical exploration of masculinities: Toxic masculinity, hyper-masculinity, homophobia, and masculinities considered outside the norm. Cowboys. Samurai. Frankenstein. Man-babies. Emperor Palpatine. Ultraman. Voltron. Prince. J-Pop stars. Using an invented method akin to a cut-up—called frankenpo—the book takes various source texts, puts them in a blender, and reconstructs them as poetry. What happens when you mix POTUS45's inaugural speech with Emperor Palpatine's speech announcing the formation of the Galactic Empire? Poetry that is essentially a discussion of the state, patriarchy, and militarism.

Los Angeles is well known as a sprawling metropolis with endless freeways that can make the city feel isolating and separate its communities. Yet in the past decade, as Prof. Jan Lin (Sociology) argues in , there has been a noticeable renewal of public life on several of the city’s iconic boulevards, including Atlantic, Crenshaw, Lankershim, Sunset, Western, and Wilshire. These arteries connect neighborhoods across the city, traverse socioeconomic divides and ethnic enclaves, and can be understood as the true locational heart of public life in the metropolis.

Lin argues that gentrification is not a single transition, but a series of changes that disinvest and re-invest neighborhoods with financial and cultural capital. Furthermore, drawing on community survey research, interviews with community residents and leaders, and ethnographic observation, Lin argues that the revitalization in Northeast LA by arts leaders and neighborhood activists marks a departure in the political culture from the older civic engagement to more socially progressive coalition work involving preservationists, environmentalists, citizen protestors, and arts organizers. Finally, Lin explores how accelerated gentrification and mass displacement of Latino/a and working-class households in the 2010s has sparked new rounds of activism as the community grapples with new class conflicts and racial divides in the struggle to self-determine its future.

Geology Prof. Darren Larsen has been awarded a Fulbright Scholar Grant to participate in the bi-national program of educational exchanges between the United States of America and Iceland. His project titled "Quantifying the relative roles of climate and human activity in driving landscape dynamics and ecosystem changes in the Icelandic highlands during the Holocene," is funded through the joint program and will take place in spring semester 2020 as part of Prof. Larsen's early career leave. Prof. Larsen will be housed at the Earth Science Institute, University of Iceland and work in close collaboration with colleagues there. The goal of the project is to develop complementary records of climate and landscape stability in the central highlands of Iceland using lake sediment and soil stratigraphic archives. Anticipated results will provide a framework for assessing the societal and environmental impacts of modern changes, and will identify the relative roles of human activity and climate variability in driving past ecosystem changes in Iceland.

Prof. Sabrina Stierwalt (Physics) was awarded a $223,073 grant from the for research of star formation and gas dynamics in interacting low mass galaxies. This work uses multi-wavelength observations to characterize these interactions and mergers which are ultimately the building blocks for more massive galaxies like our own Milky Way. The grant supports undergraduate research fellowships, including trips to observatories across the globe. The grant also provides funding for a 5-meter portable planetarium for �鶹Ƶ��students to use to engage with the community through astronomy outreach.

to purchase a high-performance computer cluster to support faculty research and teaching across the scientific disciplines. Computation has played an increasingly important role in almost all academic disciplines. This cluster will be used by faculty and students to advance research across biology, chemistry, computer science, physics, and economics. The cluster will support on-going research projects that include improving how computers use big data, studying chemical reactivity, and understanding heat transfer in fluids. Other faculty in math, cognitive science, sociology, and the media arts will also use the cluster for interdisciplinary research in numerical simulations and data analysis and visualization, as well as in emerging areas in the digital humanities and interactive media. Additionally, the cluster will prepare undergraduates in 20+ courses for future careers in the sciences. Congratulations to the grant PI, Prof. Justin Li (Computer Science) and co-PIs, Prof. Jeff Cannon (Chemistry), Prof. Diana Ngo (Economics), Prof. Janet Scheel (Physics), and Prof. Amanda Zellmer (Biology) for their successful collaboration in procuring this grant! Read more here.

Prof. Ainsley LeSure (Politics) was awarded a $15,000 and a visiting faculty fellowship for the 2019-2020 academic year at the . Both of these awards will support her book project, tentatively titled, Why Does Racism Persist in the Twenty-First Century? This project traces how the over-emphasis of the inner states of individuals – like implicit biases, intentions, motivations, sentiments, and aversions – in explanations for the tenacity of contemporary racial injustice blinds us to the racial dynamics that are unfolding right before our very eyes. Largely, through the political thought of Frantz Fanon and Hannah Arendt, this project advocates for a worldly account of racism that emphasizes the impact and significance of what people say and do to develop, not only better explanations for why racial injustice persists, but an egalitarian democratic politics that can end it. Read more here.

Chemistry Prof. Jeff Cannon's was awarded a $175,000 for their research on stereoselective reactions of dianionic enolates. These enolates can be key precursors for unnatural amino acids, and this research is specifically working to control the exact arrangement of atoms in the amino acid products so that the products function properly in biological systems. The grant also provides undergraduate research fellowships in synthetic organic chemistry.

Prof. Mijin Cha (UEP) was the principle investigator on a $75,000 grant from the Climate Equity Network. Working with colleagues from USC, UC Berkeley, �鶹Ƶ��colleague, Jim Sadd, and �鶹Ƶ��students Spruce Bohen and Jacqueline Dall, the research team provide a framework for Just Transition in California, as the state looks to move towards a low-carbon future. Just Transition ensures workers and communities are protected in the transition away from fossil fuels. The resulting report can be .

Prof. Courtney R. Baker (American Studies) was granted a fellowship at the at Emory University. She will be in residence for the 2019-2020 academic year to work on her manuscript, Tyranny of Realism: Twenty-First Century Blackness and the Ends of Cinema. The institute describes the goal of the visiting fellows program as "support[ing] research projects across the spectrum of those disciplines that examine the origins, evolution, impact and legacy of race, difference, and the modern quest for civil and human rights."

Mathematics Professors Jim Brown (PI), Treena Basu (Co-PI), and Eric Sundberg (senior personnel) have been awarded a to host a Research Experience for Undergraduates at �鶹Ƶ�� for the summers of 2020 and 2021. The grant will fund nine students chosen from a nationwide search to spend their summer at Occidental conducting research in coding theory, data science, game theory, and number theory.

Prof. Kelema Lee Moses (Art & Art History) was awarded a $65,000 (2019-2020) to support her book project, Island Modernism/Island Urbanism: Encountering Statehood in Honolulu, Hawai‘i. The project centers architectural modernism in the Pacific Basin in order to explore the ways in which island cities offer a place-based perspective to urban studies, where architects and planners are forced to develop inventive approaches to balance economic interests, environmental issues, and indigenous imperatives. Read the press release here!

Prof. Raul Navarro (Chemistry) was awarded a $55,000 . The funds will support fundamental research in Professor Navarro's lab, which focuses on the synthesis of organic molecules that have the potential to serve as new therapeutics for a range of diseases.

Prof. Bhavna Shamasunder (Urban & Environmental Policy) and co-PI Janette Robinson Flint (Executive Director, Black Women for Wellness) will serve as the PI for a project titled, "Taking Stock: Product Use Among Black and Latina Women." The project was awarded funding by the ($445,976 over three years) to support research to prevent and eliminate breast cancer. Chemicals found in everyday consumer products are linked to breast cancer. These include mammary gland carcinogens found in spot cleaners, estrogen-like chemicals found in cosmetics, and chemicals that alter mammary gland development in stain repellents. As a result, product use patterns may drive exposure to these important chemicals. Consumer product use may also add to the cumulative chemical exposure burden already experienced by some women. Few studies have addressed inequities in chemical exposures and breast cancer, and the influence of consumer product use. This community-driven pilot study is guided by the overall hypothesis that consumer product use patterns contribute to exposure and health inequities observed in women of color.

Prof. Jim Brown (Mathematics) has been awarded two grants to establish a biannual number theory conference "" to be held at �鶹Ƶ��: a and . Each year the conference will occur over a weekend in the fall and spring. It will feature two plenary speakers as well as a graduate student plenary speaker from outside of Southern California. In addition to the plenary speakers, the main portion of the program will consist of contributed talks by local undergraduate and graduate students, postdoctoral researchers, and faculty at schools without a regular number theory seminar. The conferences will seek to encourage inclusion of these groups of speakers into the larger research community.

Art & Art History Prof. Linda Besemer presented a solo exhibition, , at the Vielmetter (Los Angeles) from Nov-Dec 2019. The exhibition was comprised of ������𳾱��’s "glitch" paintings. The configuration of each painting is derived from a process of digital manipulation. The artist begins by composing on the computer, openly allowing for glitches. Moments of slippage, failure, and experimentation occur allowing for the creation of a spatial logic that not only breaks down the Cartesian perspective but also challenges the notion of technological perfection. The digital compositions are then hand-painted into picture planes of visual reverberation and dematerialized worlds of tension and dissolution. Besemer uses this approach to paint something new, something invented; open up new possibilities, and in the artist’s words "to abstract the abstract.”

Besemer's work was also featured earlier in the Vielmetter's group show (Sept-Oct 2019). ������𳾱��’s Swoop Wavy Bulge is composed through an experimental process of manipulating the 3D animation program Maya to render geometric forms. At first glance, the works appear to be completely digital but upon closer looking, ������𳾱��’s brushwork reveals the intensely handmade quality of her works. In this painting, Besemer has specifically manipulated a three-dimensional image of a grid to create an all-encompassing visual plane that teases and disorients the viewer with no clear focal point or sense of gravity.

MAC Prof. Allison de Fren's scholarly video essay (2018) examines a sub-genre of the Frankenstein film in which a mad doctor attempts to revive a disfigured/dead daughter/fiancée by stealing parts from female victims. As the video demonstrates, the (often unmet) critical potential of such films is their narrative condensation of the part-for-whole logic through which female bodies are often represented in the media. The video essay was commissioned by Stanford's Department of Art & Art History for (September 26 - October 26, 2018), funded by Stanford's Medicine and the Muse Program Frankenstein@200 Initiative.

, the science fiction feature film written and directed by Media Arts & Culture Prof. Aleem Hossain had its world premiere at Sci Fi London where it won Best Feature Film. Later in the year, Hossain won the Best Director prize at the Berlin Sci-Fi Film Festival. The film tells the story of a man named Jack who has a once-in-a-lifetime chance to emigrate off Earth… if he can find his estranged wife and convince her to come with him. Sight and Sound called After We Leave “deftly handled and moving” and CriticalPopcorn called it a “brilliant debut.” Watch an interview with Prof. Hossain .

In August, Theater Prof. Sarah Kozinn had the first public reading of her new play, 21.06, The Lawrence v. Texas Project. The play is based on the events leading up to the 2003 United States Supreme Court Case Lawrence v. Texas. The Court’s decision marked the first major victory towards equal citizenship for LGBTQ Americans by ruling that state sodomy laws are unconstitutional. In 21.06, named after Texas’s Homosexual Conduct Law, Prof. Kozinn takes legal documents, testimony, interviews, and news footage as its primary materials. She weaves together found evidence with constructed history to reinvigorate the story with the lives of the men whose arrest was used to contest the constitutionality of state sodomy laws. By resisting the archive, or troubling it, the play attempts to disrupt the authorizing forces of a particular history by pronouncing, making legible, and dreaming up what the legal record left out.

Prof. Kozinn will also be appearing in an upcoming episode of the new Amazon series . Shot in live action, and then animated over the footage, the show explores the "elastic nature of reality."

Art & Art History Prof. Mary Beth Heffernan’s 2015 social practice art response to the West Africa Ebola epidemic is curated in a in London. The PPE Portrait Project humanized healthcare workers by placing adhesive portrait photos on the outside of the frightening hazmat suits so that patients could identify their caregivers. Wellcome’s new permanent gallery opening in September, 2019 will explore trust, identity and health in a changing world.

The and reviewed the show, with the former including a photo and paragraph describing Prof. Heffernan's work!

Congratulations to Prof. Adam Schoenberg (Music) and Christopher Hawthorne (UEP)--for winning Los Angeles Area Emmy Awards for their work on the 2018 television documentary . Prof. Hawthorne directed and served as the executive producer of the documentary, while Prof. Schoenberg composed the score.

Art & Art History Prof. Linda Lyke had a solo exhibition of her work, Field Notes: When Taxonomy Becomes Iconography, at the Muckenthaler Cultural Center in Fullerton. The show of monotyped and silkscreened prints, collages and solar etchings vividly captures the spontaneous and immediate sense of discovery that stems from the close and careful observation of nature. Read more here.

Media Arts & Culture Prof. Broderick Fox's feature screenplay Picture Man has won the feature script category in the University Film & Video Association's 2019 Juried Scriptwriting Competition. The script, chosen from a record number of entries, is a World War II period piece that uses the spy thriller genre to address deeper issues of Japanese-American internment, xenophobia, and distorted nationalism. Founded in 1946, the University Film and Video Association is one of the largest professional organizations and annual conferences for film and media studies, focusing on the creative, critical, and pedagogical practices of college and university media professors. Prof. Fox also won the UFVA screenwriting competition in 2017 for his feature screenplay One Degree. This year he shared Best of Conference honors with Michael McAlexander of Cal State Fullerton for his script Lockdown.

Prof. Brian Fitzmorris (Theater) was the Line Producer for the at the J.W. Marriott at LA Live on March 30, 2019. Attended by over 1,200 guests, the event was hosted by Jane Fonda and Lily Tomlin, honored Governor Jerry Brown with the 2019 Kinship Award, and Homeboy Industries alum, Fabian Debora received the Homeboy Hero award. Six current �鶹Ƶ��students were hired to work with Prof. Fitzmorris, giving them valuable professional experience and credits. They were joined by 11 �鶹Ƶ��alumni on the crew.

Prof. Fitzmorris was also the Line Producer for the event on May 5, 2019, featuring Leslie Odom Jr. performing at a private estate in Santa Monica. Prof. Fitzmorris hired current Theater Department staff and students along with �鶹Ƶ�� alumni in support of the event, which raised over $720,000 for the charity.

Computer Science Prof. Kathryn Leonard has been for the , an international professional organization that is a member of the Conference Board of Mathematical Sciences. The purpose of AWM is to encourage those who identify as women and girls to study and to have active careers in the mathematical sciences, and to promote equal opportunity and the equal treatment of women and girls in the mathematical sciences.

, the science fiction feature film written and directed by Media Arts & Culture Prof. Aleem Hossain has won a slew of awards and garnered rave reviews this year. The film won Best Feature Film at Sci Fi London and Hossain won the Best Director prize at the Berlin Sci-Fi Film Festival. also recently reviewed the film, giving it 9 out of 10, and calling it "A shining example of indie filmmaking at its finest." called After We Leave “deftly handled and moving” and called it a “brilliant debut.”

Angry citizens are protesting throughout Latin America. In an Politics Prof. Jennifer Piscopo and her coauthors discuss how protests could benefit women: their research shows that Latin American political parties nominate more women when voters distrust the current political establishment and are angry about corruption.

In October 2019, Kinesiology Prof. Marci Raney will assume the position of President-Elect of the (SWACSM), a chapter that boasts professional membership of ~1300 from California, Nevada, Arizona, Utah, New Mexico, and Hawaii. In partnership with the national organization, SWACSM aims "to promote and integrate scientific research, education, and practical applications of sports medicine and exercise science to maintain and enhance physical performance, fitness, health, and quality of life." The elected position includes three years of service in the following roles: President-Elect, President, Past-President. Prof. Raney's primary focus for the next few months will be planning the 2020 annual meeting.

Prof. Andrew Shtulman (Psychology & Cognitive Science) received the for .

The Institute for the Study of Los Angeles' Prof. Jeremiah Axelrod's article, "," was awarded the Outstanding Article Award by the Pacific Ancient and Modern Language Association [PAMLA]. As a benefit of the recognition, the full article is open access this year.

Philosophy Prof. Clair Morrissey's collaboration with Biology faculty Prof. Beth Braker, Prof. Gretchen North, and Prof. Shana Goffredi was , as part of a partnership between Engaged Philosophy and the Public Philosophy Network. In the interview, Prof. Morrissey describes the collaboration as well as her approach to studying and teaching philosophy.

, UEP Prof. Mijin Cha taps into her expertise in climate justice to explain union members' support of climate protection policies and, more broadly, why we should reject the false dichotomy of "jobs vs. environment."

Economics Prof. Bevin Ashenmiller was interviewed by reporter Sarah Gonzalez for an episode of NPR’s podcast “”, on the economics of recycling.

In an , DWA Prof. Anthony Chase offers his thoughts on recent developments in Palestinian politics, with reference to Israeli and U.S. policies with a particular impact on Palestine.

Congratulations to Geology Prof. Margi Rusmore for being named the first Gibby Professor of Science! ;A Fellow of the Geological Society of America, Prof. Rusmore is an author of more than two dozen publications and dozens of abstracts on her research, which has been funded by the National Science Foundation. She is currently an editor for the American Geophysical Union’s Tectonics, one of the top peer-reviewed journals in the field.

Inspired by their 50th reunion last year, Barbara Gibby, '68 (a religious studies and psychology double major, and a pioneer in public school special education) and Michael Gibby, '68 (a chemistry major who went on to found Arion Systems, an engineering service company) established the professorship “because we really wanted to do was something impactful. We really wanted to hit the core of a liberal arts education.”

History Prof. Jane Hong's article, "," was awarded the . The news was announced at the recent Organization of American Historians (OAH) meeting in Philadelphia and came with a small monetary prize.

The article examines the Philippine Commonwealth Government’s role in the success of the 1946 Luce-Celler Act’s provisions making Filipina/os eligible for US citizenship. It argues that Philippine officials at Manila adopted the legislative cause as part of their broader preparations for Philippine independence. They recognized that Filipina/o American communities would be vital to the state-building projects that followed independence, particularly through the remittances they sent back to the islands. Through this support of naturalization rights, Manila officials sought to inculcate in Filipina/o Americans a sense of responsibility to the islands that transcended formal citizenship. A centering of Manila’s role in the Washington-based naturalization campaign reveals Philippine officials’ instrumental understanding of the US citizenship bill as a means to achieve their own national goals. More broadly, it foregrounds decolonization and the dismantling of formal empire as important levers of US exclusion repeal toward Asian peoples.

Prof. Lesley Chiou (Economics) was invited by the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) to present her research on the effects of Internet diffusion on pricing and competition in offline markets. Her presentation was part of the , managed by the Economic Analysis Division. The goal of the seminar series is to advance recent economic analyses and to address difficult issues surrounding the emergence of new technologies.

Prof. Marla Stone (History) has been appointed president of the for a three year term beginning in January 2019. The Society for Italian Historical Studies (SIHS) is a professional organization designed to encourage the study and teaching of Italian history and culture. It promotes teaching, research, and publication in any period or field of Italian history and culture, awards prizes to students and established scholars for original contributions to these fields, sponsors conferences and lectures, cooperates with other organizations and groups that share its goals, promotes the exchange of ideas and information among all interested in Italian history and culture. The SIHS is an affiliated society of the American Historical Association.

Prof. Shana Goffredi (Biology) was interviewed for a piece in the The New Yorker (“”) on her research on unusual deep-sea worms that team up with beneficial bacteria to break down mammal bones (primarily whales) when they sink to the ocean floor. These studies, and others like it, help us to understand the cooperative partnerships that enable life to thrive in the most unexpected places on Earth.

Prof. Sharla Fett (History) and Dr. Brenda Stevenson, UCLA, have been selected as the 2019-2020 for the William Andrews Clark Memorial Library at UCLA. They will be organizing three conferences under the theme, “Contested Foundations: Commemorating the Red Letter Year of 1619.” The year 1619 was designated as the red-letter year in Virginia, the first permanent colony in British North America, for three reasons—it marked the beginning of a representative government; the arrival of captive African laborers; and the initiation of a successful plan to encourage permanent family development through the importation of English women. The combination of these efforts, all meant to enhance the lives of the colonial male elite, marked the beginning of a true settler colony for Britain in North America. This beginning came with grim implications for the indigenous populations the British encountered. These experiments in governance, settler colonialism, and a racialized economy also proved to be the characteristic underpinnings of our independent nation two hundred and fifty years later.

Prof. Marla Stone (History) was featured in Episode 3 of the new PBS documentary, as an expert on Mussolini and Italian Fascism. The documentary series focuses on the techniques used by dictators to gain and hold power.